Friday, September 30, 2011

Reliance Power ::Emkay: Top Buys

TP : Rs155
Investment Rationale
§ Huge captive coal potential with reserves of about 3bn MT and annual production potential of 95mn MT in next
5-7 years offers (1) fuel security and (2) one of the cheapest cost power (fuel cost in the range of Rs0.40/unit)
§ Significant progress achieved in its power plant/coal mine execution -either in line or ahead of schedule
§ Posting excellent operational performance as against other IPPs subdued performance - we have increased its
earnings estimates substantially (+15%) versus other IPPs substantial (-25%) downgrades
§ Merchant capacity only in plants with captive coal - excellent strategy
§ None of the current problems of private power utilities are applicable - fuel (captive), merchant prices (merchant
capacity to be only in captive fuel plants) and SEB bad health (cheap supplies)
§ Even in case of Krishnapatnam, the Indonesian law impact is likely to be insignificant in the worst case scenario
Valuations
§ Mid-term triggers - 1) COD of 4,260MW by Dec12 (incl. 1 unit of Sasan), 2) coal production in Sasan - Jun12, 3)
milestones in Tilaiya & Indonesian mines & 4) gas plant and gas supplies
§ Solidity in the business model and positive triggers are being ignored with Reliance power valuations implying
long term merchant rate of Rs1.3/unit, very safe
§ We foresee RPL as the most sustainable private utility. Buy with Fair value of Rs155/Share

NHPC ::Emkay: Top Buys

TP : Rs34
Investment Rationale
§ Adj. Core ROE of 21% in FY11 - Including by Rs2.8bn revenue recognition in 1QFY12, related to FY10 and
FY11
§ Grossing up to be at full tax rate for FY12 vs. MAT in 1Q12 - 4Q profits to be higher by about Rs3bn
§ Previous yr sales likely to continue with water cess approval likely in 3Q and two tariff orders likely in FY12 itself
§ Regulatory trigger - CERC contemplating an increase in hydro returns. Consultation paper on the same likely to
be out very shortly
§ Commissioning pick up; as against 120MW in past two years, next five years to witness quantum jump - 515MW
in FY12, 697MW in FY13, 960MW in FY14, 1000MW in FY15 and 1000MW in FY16
§ Likely reduction in working capital driven by issue of tariff orders - about Rs15bn to be realized
Valuations
§ About 25-30% cheaper on ROE adjusted valuations compared with NTPC and PGCIL
§ Fair value of Rs34/Share without regulatory trigger and conservative commissioning targets
§ Only risk present is execution - a significant part of under construction capacity already passed through this
stage

buy Coal India : Wage revision – negotiation to resume post October festivities: Nomura research,

COMPANY QUICK COMMENT
Takeaways from our call with CIL’s management on non-executive wage revision: [1] Meeting on Sep 22-23 concluded by CIL asking the trade unions to present a common set of demands [2] There is disagreement over the quantum of festival-related bonus/ex-gratia for FY12 [3] Next meeting likely post the festive period in October. Earnings sensitivity – one-day labor strike can lead to production loss of 1-1.2mt and if the demand for higher bonus is met, FY12F employee cost would be higher by 1.7%; combined impact on FY12F EPS would be ~2%. Maintain Buy; wage revision remains a near-term overhang.




Wage revision – negotiation to resume post October festivities
Event We had a call with the Coal India (CIL) management to assess the progress on negotiations relating to non-executive wage revision and on news reports suggesting the labor force would be going on a country-wide strike on October 10, 2011 following the breakdown of negotiations with the trade unions on bonus/ex-gratia/coverage for contract workers for 2011.
As per media reports (Press Trust of India, Business Line) on September 23/24, 2011, the labor unions demanded Rs25,000/laborer as productivity-linked bonus (or ex-gratia) whereas CIL has promised a bonus of to Rs17,000/laborer (up YoY from Rs15,000/laborer). As per CIL, the promised increase in bonus would raise total outgo on bonus from Rs5.6bn to Rs6.2bn.
ANALYSIS
Wage revision negotiations – where do things stand?
As per our conversation with the CIL management on outcome of the September 22-23, 2011 meeting with the trade unions on wage revision, we gather – [1] Meeting broadly concluded by CIL asking the five trade unions to present a common charter of demands / expectations, [2] There was disagreement over the quantum of festival-linked bonus/ex-gratia for FY2012 (as highlighted by the news reports on this issue), [3] Next meeting is likely to be scheduled after the festive season in October (i.e. potentially in October-end / November).
Bonus/ex-gratia payment – how material is the amount involved?
Based on the data available as per the news reports, the festival-linked bonus/ex-gratia accounted for ~3% of CIL’s overall employee cost in FY11; CIL’s promise to raise the per laborer bonus/ex-gratia from Rs15,000/- to Rs17,000/- would imply a 11.5% YoY rise in this salary component to Rs6.2bn (~3% of our FY12F total employee cost) for CIL. If CIL management agrees to the union’s demand for Rs25,000/- bonus/ex-gratia per laborer, ceteris paribus, our FY12F the incremental employee cost would rise by 1.7%.
Wage revision – sensitivity to earnings
Our earnings forecast for CIL builds-in [1] A 30% wage would increase for non-executive workers (effective July 2011), which translates into 19% / 9% YoY rise in employee cost in FY12 / FY13 respectively, [2] FY12 production/offtake at 447.5mt and 452.8mt. If the reported strike on October 10 takes place, it would lead to a loss of 1-1.2mn tons of coal production. Ceteris paribus, the potential production loss together with 1.7% increase in FY12F employee cost (if labor demand for higher bonus is met), would lower our FY12F EPS forecast by ~2%.
IMPLICATIONS
[1] Although the potential impact of the debated bonus/ex-gratia component is not very significant, we expect the impending wage negotiations (and related threat of potential production/offtake disruption) to remain an overhang on the near-term stock price performance.
Instead, we focus on CIL’s capacity to make-up for the shortfall in 1HFY12 production/offtake (following the sharper-than-expected monsoon-related slowdown in production / dispatches) and the magnitude of wage revision as bigger downside risks to our FY12F/13F earnings forecast for the company.

Maintain BUY as the structural growth story remains intact. Stock trades at FY12F EV/Resource and EV/reserve of 2x and 0.6x respectively.

Thursday, September 29, 2011

India Power Utilities --Banking on policy action in the sector 􀂄UBS

B anking on policy action in the sector
􀂄 We met with various Indian power sector participants last week
We met with several power sector participants over the past week (14 September in
Mumbai, 15 Sep in Lucknow and 16 Sep in Delhi). We met officials at power
distribution companies, State Electricity Boards (SEBs), the regulator (Central
Electricity Regulatory Commission or CERC), the Planning Commission,
independent consultants in the sector, and power generation companies.
􀂄 We wanted an update on the tariff hikes, SEB losses and coal supply
The key objective behind these meetings was to get the most up-to-date sector
views of industry participants. We wanted to understand the impact of the recent
tariff hikes across states and its implications for the financial health of the SEBs.
We also wanted to understand the outlook on coal availability for the power
generation sector.
􀂄 Policy action from central government likely; states to raise tariffs
Our findings are: 1) the central government would focus on reducing SEB losses
and improving domestic coal availability; 2) states would continue to raise tariffs
and would rationalise electricity tariffs so that cost of supply and revenue are better
aligned; and 3) the power sector would continue to grow at a minimum of 5-6%
p.a.
􀂄 UBS view and action: Power Grid and Lanco are our top picks
We think there are attractive buying opportunities in the sector. We like companies
with low risk (Power Grid and NTPC) or those with compelling valuations (Lanco
and Reliance Infrastructure). We also have Buy ratings on NTPC, Tata Power, and
Reliance Infra. We recently upgraded Reliance Power from a Sell to Buy rating.

Coal India Ltd - Workers Strike threat glooms on CIL, but it's too early to react- upgrade to Hold:: Sunidhi

Media report suggests that “Coal India unions have threatened to go on strike on 10thOctober across all mines, if their demand for a minimum `25000 per worker bonus is not accepted by CIL management”.

Though management has maintained its stand on the bonus issue despite union threat of strike, and has offered `17000 per worker as bonus versus `15000 offered in FY11. Initial assessment of the strike by management indicates volume loss of 0.8-1.0 mn tonne of production.

Our take:
Our initial analysis to this situation suggests that such strike or even a higher bonus wouldn’t have huge material impact on company financials for FY12E. We have expected bonus payments (of c.15% higher) in our employee cost estimates for FY12E and FY13E. We expect if higher bonus of `23500 is paid, it could lead to additional out go of `2149 mn above our original estimates. Such higher bonus could impact FY12E EBIDTA by c.1% (hence immaterial).

But the risk which can be inherited by agreeing to such higher bonus would be its on-going wage hike negotiations. Management could be in dilemma of agreeing to such higher bonus, which if accepted could lead to more stubborn behavior by its union during its ongoing wage hike negotiations.

Valuation and Recommendation
We expect CIL’s revenues to grow at a CAGR of 10% during FY11—FY13E. However we believe that various uncertainties like wage revision, rake shortages, implementation of MMDR bill etc could act as a road block for company’s growth momentum. We have factored in a volume of 445 mn tonnes and 475 mn tonnes for FY12E and FY13E respectively. With recent correction in stock price, we feel partial uncertainties regarding CIL has been priced in. Any further sharp decline in stock price could be used as an entry opportunity. Thus at CMP of `347 we upgrade our rating to HOLD from REDUCE earlier while keeping target price unchanged at `383 which translates to EV/EBIDTA multiple of 8x of its FY13E EBIDTA of `222bn.

JPMorgan:: Power Grid : Revisiting the investment rationale post recent underperformance: Maintain OW

PGCIL, a classic low beta (~0.66) defensive utility has outperformed the Sensex
by ~10% over the last year but absolute stock returns have been down 10%. Over
the last month, PGCIL has underperformed the Sensex by ~6%.
 Underperformance is attributable to two things in our view: (A) Statistical
reason: PGCIL, a bond proxy, has a high negative correlation to bond yields.
The stock has delivered negative returns in a rising interest rate environment;
(B) Fundamental reason: In the past six months, PGCIL has added ~Rs23bn to
gross block, FY12 target is ~Rs95-100bn. Clearly, commissioning of
transmission networks has seen delays.
 We see an opportunity to buy at current levels: (A) The interest rate cycle is
approaching peak levels, rate-cuts likely in FY13E, (B) CoD schedule of
transmission capex by PGCIL in FY12 is fairly back-ended as per CEA data;
capitalization may see a pick-up in 2H; (C) Valuations at a trough. 14.7x
FY12E EPS is well below historical average (~17.7x since Jan-09); (D) our
channel checks indicate that EPC contractors are positive about improvement in
pace of execution after Mr. R.N. Nayak (ex-Director Operations) assumed
charge as CMD starting Sep-2011.
 Annual report analysis. FY11E D/E was 1.91x, after incorporating 12th Plan
capex of ~Rs840bn (~20% discount to target), our D/E estimate remains below
70:30, implying dilution is avoidable in the medium term. A red flag on
payment delays (beyond 60 days allowed) in a few pockets viz. Delhi, Daman
& Diu, and certain north eastern states. Detailed annual report takeaways, a
close look at PGCIL’s revenue and DCF model are inside the report.
 Our Mar-12 DCF-based PT of Rs116, implies ~20% upside potential. We
reiterate our OW view on the stock. We think PGCIL offers relatively
safe/stable growth as compared to IPPs, which face significantly higher
uncertainty around land, fuel, environmental clearances and merchant prices.
Downside risks: slippage in capex and capitalization assumed in our base case
(see sensitivity analysis on page 2 in the report).

Buy Persistent Systems: target price of Rs. 387::Nirmal Bang Research

Snapshot Persistent Systems Ltd (PSL) was incorporated in 1990 and is engaged in the outsourced product development (OPD) business. It caters to the software product companies and provides assistance across the lifecycle of product development. In addition, they are one of the front-runners in hot areas of cloud computing, analytics, collaboration and telecom mobility. Investment Rationale Deep focus in niche area of OPD Offshore OPD market is growing at a CAGR of 9.1% and is expected to touch $16.1 bn in 2013 as per IDC. PSL is a pure OPD vendor having expertise across the value chain of product development and thus has a competitive advantage. Forerunner in newer technology PSL is one of the pioneers in giving services in new technology areas like Cloud, Analytics, Collaboration and Enterprise Mobility. All these are hot buzzing segments gaining specific priorities amongst mid-sized business houses worldwide as per IBM study. PSL derived almost 40% of its revenues from these emerging areas in FY11. Growth in IP led revenues PSL engages almost 4% to 6% of its employees in R&D. This has resulted in the company owning 14 IP’s (Intellectual Property) currently and many are in pipeline. We expect the share of IP revenue to increase to 17% in FY13E from 8.8% in FY11. This would result in the expansion of EBIDTA margins by 60 bps in FY13E. Growing in a slow growth environment PSL focuses on non-BFSI segment which currently is under chaos in the US and European countries. PSL’s focus in the telecom, Life sciences and Infrastructure segments cushions it from the Global slowdown. Valuation & Recommendation PSL, over the years has built a differentiated model focusing only in the OPD business and is investing heavily in the upcoming areas of technology. The next growth for the company would start coming from the IP led revenues where it would have a shared risks and revenue model on the pay per use concept. Amidst fierce competition from the bigger players, supply-side pressures and gloomy external environment, we believe PSL would emerge as a winner led by good visionary management. At CMP, PSL is trading at 9.7x and 7.8x its FY12E and FY13E expected earnings. We assign a 12x target P/E for FY12E earnings and arrive at a target price of Rs. 387 and assign a BUY rating on the stock.

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

cartoon

Buy NHPC: Emerging from shadows of thermal; Deutsche Bank

Emerging from shadows of thermal; initiating with Buy

Preferred pick in Indian power PSU utilities
We are initiating coverage on NHPC with a Buy. The investment case is premised
on:- a) 13% earnings CAGR over FY11-14E driven by bunching of 1,212MW
capacity addition and unprecedented reservoir levels, thanks to healthy monsoons;
and b) an attractive 8% earnings yield (in line with peers) coupled with reasonable
valuations at 1.1x FY12e BV (vs 1.8x for peers), post a 33% correction since IPO.


We note the regulatory framework is likely to turn favorable for the hydro sector as
India focuses on tackling peak-energy shortages in a coal-constrained
environment.
Hydro: low operational risk and working in a benign regulatory environment
Thanks to a rise in reservoir levels due to two consecutive good monsoons, we
find low operational risk for earnings in the medium term. The regulatory
environment also looks favorable as: (1) cost over-runs, if any, in delayed projects
have historically got approval for pass-through in tariffs; (2) the current cost plus
return framework of 19-20% RoE applies till 2015e vs 2011 for peers such as
NTPC, Power Grid; (3) The regulator has invited suggestions on enhancing returns
in the hydro sector to encourage investment, to reduce burgeoning peak deficits.
Bunching of new capacities could offset earnings risk from mean reversion
Our model factors mean-reversion of operating rates in FY13e/14e, as generation
in FY11/12 has been higher from good monsoons. Further, we assume 3-6 month
delays above guidance, but still have seven of its projects totaling 1,212MW
commissioning over FY12/13. Our estimates are in line with consensus.
Risk-reward looks favorable at 1.1x FY12E BV; Buy with TP of INR29/share
We value NHPC on a P/B and DCF approach, valuing operational assets at 2x P/B
(INR18/sh), and 1x for 30% equity in CWIP and cash/investments, to derive a
target price of INR29/sh. We initiate with a Buy, on 1.1x P/B, backed by 13%
adjusted earnings CAGR and the possibility of regulatory incentives (draft
regulation of Sept’10). While we build in 3-6 month delays, key risks are further
commissioning delays (9-12 months’ delay has INR1.5 impact) and generation
volume lower than design energy due to drought (INR1.8 impact). J&K govt and a
civil society group have earlier tried to take back the projects in state


Investment thesis
Outlook
We initiate coverage of NHPC with a Buy rating and a target price of INR29/share. We find
NHPC – India’s largest hydro power utility – to be amongst the better-positioned utilities in
the Indian power sector, thanks to the high reservoir levels, which should ensure high
availability and consistent returns at a time when fuel sourcing threatens to hurt thermal
producers. While so far, NHPC’s earnings have surprised investors largely due to better
water availability, going forward, we see a bunching of new capacity of 1,212MW between
FY12-13e, which would add 26% to overall capacity. More importantly, the company would
go into the next phase of earnings – which could improve RoE by 200-300bps by FY15-16e
and earnings are set to jump 45% by FY14e. We estimate EPS to rise by a 13% CAGR over
FY11-14e, which incorporates the current regulatory return norms being maintained.
However, going by statements made by the regulator, there seems to be a need to raise the
regulated returns for hydro power projects. Currently, PSUs get a RoE of 15.5% on original
equity invested and performance benchmarked incentives could vary between 1-3%. A 1%
higher RoE on equity invested could raise EPS growth CAGR by ~2%.
Valuation
We set our 12m target price of INR29/share for NHPC based on the average of price/book
(using the Gordon Growth Model) and DCF methodology. In estimating the exit price/book
multiple, we have split the book as follows: (a) Invested equity base, which gives 19-20%
RoE, growing at 12% on a compound basis over the next three years, at a price/book of 2x,
and (b) Net worth employed in CWIP and the balance, which matches the cash/investments,
both valued at price/book of 1x, as these would be invested either into assets to generate
regulated returns or be returned back to share holders in the form of dividends.
Our DCF methodology is based on a two-stage DCF method, wherein we have assumed
terminal growth of 3%, CoE of 13.0% (6.5% risk-free rate and 8.1% risk premium in line with
Deutsche Bank estimates) and with a Beta of 0.80. The beta looks reasonable to us given the
assured cash flow nature of the business, similar to other regulated utilities in India.
Risks
As it is in a project development phase, and with earnings largely being regulated in nature,
important downside risks are a monsoon failure which could impact PLF/PAF or project
delays (historically between 13-20 months). While our estimates factor in delays of 19-29
months, any additional delay could impact valuations by ~INR1.5/share on 6 months
(assuming the regulator approves the cost over-run). Further, if the PLF/PAF are lower than
our estimates by 2%, we estimate the impact on valuations could be about 5% or
INR1.5/share. Delayed payments, if any, could add to receivables and reduce the cash on the
books, which may impact dividend payments (see pages 18-19 for a detailed discussion of
risks).

cartoon

JPMorgan, What do Asia investors think about Indian IT? - Three cues to consider buying of select Indian IT stocks

Over the past week, we met a cross-section of Asia-based investors (about 30 in all) of
various investment hues in Hong Kong/Singapore to discuss the Indian IT sector. The
consensus view is that the sector’s valuations could see some downside in the near
term. For example, TCS’ valuation of 17x FY13E P/E is perceived as expensive in the
context of India’s market valuation and the absence of meaningful consensus
downgrades in India IT. By and large, investors are inclined to sell into a potentially
sporadic rally created by the rupee depreciation and other temporary favorable
factor(s). The focus on our meetings centered on spotting cues for timing the
buying of front-line Indian IT stocks. Should investors buy India IT? If so, when?
We present three circumstances/indicators that we believe investors should consider in
order to consider their buying of Indian IT stocks:
 Indicator 1: when we get feelers about the CY12 IT budgets: In our view, CY12
budgets that are flat-to-low single digit down, in aggregate (vs. CY11 as %), could
be a driver for IT stocks. The market currently fears a difficult CY12/FY13 (perhaps
factoring in severe IT budget cuts (in aggregate terms) well exceeding 5%). In fact,
on-time indicators of the direction of the budgets themselves are a positive as clients
tend to push out decision-making on budgets in such times (recall 2009 when the
process of budget-setting was severely delayed).
 Indicator 2: when consensus brings numbers down. As we noted in our Sep. 12,
2011 Note, “Consensus is a perverse predictor of stock price movements - it rarely
gets the turn of the cycle right,” seeing consensus bringing numbers down is a
starting signal to think in terms of buying, not selling. So, far we note that
consensus FY13E EPS of Infosys of (Rs159) has some distance to travel to our
FY13 EPS estimate of Infosys of Rs150. As the previous 2008 downturn showed,
consensus rarely captures the “turn of the cycle” (or inflection points) and by the
time consensus comprehends the cycle turn and adjusts itself, stocks will likely start
exhibiting contrary/opposite moves. In 2009, stocks bottomed when consensus came
off just a fraction (typically 20-40%) of eventual length of full consensus
downgrades. We present several charts in support of this thesis.
 Indicator 3: FY13E P/E at 12-13x is a target multiple to buy and not to
capitulate. Should front-line Indian IT stocks become much cheaper, it
behooves us to do analysis of what medium-to-long term expectations are priced
in. As a rule of thumb, 5% perpetual growth translates into a forward P/E multiple of
~12-13x (also corroborated using the equation steady-state multiple = 1-(g/ROIC)/
(cost of equity – g). P/E of 12-13x on FY13E should be a signal telling us that
Infosys/TCS are pricing in no more than 5-6% growth in perpetuity starting
FY13 (or no market share gains by India IT hereafter).
 Investment view. TCS (OW), our top pick, is the most over-owned India IT stock
among Asia investors. Broadly, it also has a significant overweight position in client
portfolios relative to its index weight. This technical aspect is causing some clients
to be cautious about the stock. Barring moderated valuations, Infosys (rated Neutral)
does not inspire much confidence among investors. We believe Investors are also
less confident about Wipro’s ability to turn around and would not mind sacrificing
some upside before taking another look. We think Wipro could be the dark horse,
macros permitting. Investors are not able to paint HCLT’s longer-term margin
profile for longer-term investing in this stock.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Anil Ambani upping RComm stake as tower talks progress

MUMBAI (Reuters) - Anil Ambani plans to increase his stake in Reliance Communications as the debt-laden telecoms company founded by his family edges towards a sale of its phone tower unit after a year of trying.
Reliance Comm has hired UBS and sought $5 billion for its 95-percent stake in its Reliance Infratel tower unit, sources told Reuters in August, as the country's No.2 mobile phone carrier by subscribers struggles with its more than $7 billion net debt.
But potential bidders had expressed concern about Reliance's valuation being at least $1 billion too high, the sources had said.
"When we hopefully conclude the Reliance Infratel transaction, it will be the largest private equity transaction in the history of this country," Ambani, India's eighth richest man according to Forbes, told a packed annual meeting of shareholders on Tuesday.
Sources had previously said UBS had reached out to U.S. companies American Tower and Crown Castle International, India's Viom Networks and UAE's Etisalat on the tower sale.
The bank had also contacted private-equity firms Carlyle, Apax Partners and Blackstone, the sources said.
Reliance Communications is battling amid a fast-growing but ferociously competitive Indian cellular market as low call prices and high operational costs squeeze margins.
Eight straight quarters of falling profits and failed attempts to raise cash are eroding investor confidence in the company, whose stock has lost 44 percent of its value so far this year, leaving the company valued at $3.4 billion.
Seeking to boost confidence in the company, Ambani said Reliance Comm's founders -- largely himself, his family and companies controlled by him -- would raise their stake in the company to 75 percent, from 67.9 percent at the end of June, without giving a time frame.
"The market valuation is very low, and there is every reason for the promoter to raise stake in his company," Manish Sonthalia, a fund manager at Motilal Oswal Asset Management.
"It is also an indication to the market that the stock is undervalued, and rightly so. Even at replacement cost, Reliance Comm is certainly worth more than this," he said.
Shares in the company extended their gains to as much as 4.9 percent following the news. The stock is the fourth-worst performing stock in the 50-share NSE Nifty Index this year.
DEBT REDUCTION FOCUS
"The positive thing here is at least they are concerned about the debt and making efforts to reduce debt," said R.K. Gupta, managing director at Taurus Asset Management in New Delhi, of Ambani's comments.
This is not Reliance Comm's first attempt at raising cash and cutting debt.
Last year, the company tried to sell a 26-percent stake in itself to pare debt, but found no takers. A plan to float its tower unit in an initial public offering also failed to take off and a deal to merge its tower arm with a rival collapsed.
But Ambani expressed optimism on Tuesday.
"We are in an advanced stage of negotiations with a number of consortiums who have expressed great interest in this very valuable asset and I'm sure that we will be able to move forward expeditiously," he said.
"I am committed and the company is committed to ensure our debt levels are substantially reduced," he said.
Reliance Infratel has more than 50,000 telecoms towers. A senior company executive said last month they expected a sale of the unit to almost halve the company's current debt burden.
"If the tower business goes away, that would reduce a chunk of their debt, and that is very important in determining the turnaround for the whole company," said Motilal's Sonthalia.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RCom Chairman Anil Ambani today said the company is in talks with many consortia to sell its telecom tower unit Reliance Infratel in what could be biggest ever private equity deal in the country.  
Addressing the shareholders at RCom AGM, Ambani also said the promoters plan to raise their stake in the flagship company to 75% from the current 67.9%.
"We are in the advanced stages of negotiations with a number of consortia which have expressed great interest in this very valuable asset, and I am sure that we will be able to move forward expeditiously. When we hopefully conclude the Reliance Infratel transaction, it will be the largest private equity transaction in the history of this country," Ambani told the shareholders at the AGM here. 
Despite posting a loss, the company has declared a modest dividend. 
At present, it has an annual interest burden of over Rs 679 crore on a debt of around Rs 32,000 crore. The company also hopes to maintain its debt at substantially lower levels, Ambani added. 
The development comes amid reports that private equity giants Blackstone and Carlyle Group have jointly expressed an interest to bid for Reliance Communications' tower business.     
At the AGM, the shareholders also approved issue of equity shares of RCom to qualified institutional buyers and raising of resources through issue of securities in the international markets.     
Besides, the company also received the shareholders' nod for appointment of J Ramachandran as a Director and adoption of full-year financial statements for 2010-11.     
The shareholders also approved appointment of a Manager of the company and that of the auditors

Bharat Petroleum (BPCL) High-quality oil find in offshore Brazil ::Macquarie Research,

Bharat Petroleum
High-quality oil find in offshore Brazil
Event
􀂃 Petrobras, the operator of the BM-SEAL-11 concession in offshore Brazil, has
confirmed the presence of excellent-quality oil in the SEAL-M-426 discovery
made in Oct 2010. This is a find of a “fresh oil province” as per Petrobras,
though no reserve estimates have been indicated as yet. BPCL through its
upstream subsidiary BPRL holds a 20% stake in the block. BPCL’s upstream
footprint as well as potential has been growing through partnerships with large
explorers like Anadarko and Petrobras. We have conservatively valued its
upstream portfolio at Rs90/sh in our SOTP based target price of Rs808/sh,
with no value assigned to this block yet. We reiterate Outperform.
Impact
􀂃 Ultra-deepwater cretaceous light oil find validated: According to BPCL,
this well in the Barra formation of the Sergipe Alagoas basin was the first
ultra-deepwater (2311m) drilling in the region. Petrobras said that testing
revealed very high quality light oil of 43 degree API in the upper sections, and
slightly denser oil of 32 degree API at greater depths (expensive benchmark
crude grade Brent has an API of 38.1 degree). It also confirmed that the
reserves located at sub-surface depths of between 5,050-5,400 meters have
excellent porosity and permeability, which indicates high probability of
recovery.
􀂃 Prospectivity of region has been high: This region has had multiple large
finds in various basins, which indicates that the whole area is highly
propsective. BPCL’s own Wahoo discovery is a prime example of where large
net pays of 195ft and 90ft were encountered 2 km apart. The Barra discovery
cretaceous reservoir is expected to have an areal extent of 70 sq km,
according to BPCL.
􀂃 Upstream programme of BPCL robust: BPCL plans to drill 16 wells this
year, and has investments of US$3bn lined up for only upstream exploration
and development over the next 5 years (30% of overall planned capex, see
Fig 3). At roughly 1/12th of upstream giant ONGC’s capex, this is beginning to
assume significant proportions.
Earnings and target price revision
􀂃 No change.
Price catalyst
􀂃 12-month price target: Rs808.00 based on a Sum of Parts methodology.
􀂃 Catalyst: Capping of subsidised LPG cylinders, commercial production from
Bina refinery
Action and recommendation
􀂃 We believe that apart from the upstream portfolio, BPCL’s core business of
refining is set to receive a boost from the startup of the high-complexity Bina
refinery. It is also strategically shifting away from a totally subsidy-dependent
business model through spending a total of US$10bn over the next 5 years on
subsidy-free businesses like upstream and refining

TCS:: Strong business momentum to continue -- Credit Suisse,

 We assume coverage of TCS with an OUTPERFORM rating and
a 12-month TP of Rs1,350 (28% upside). Our new EPS estimates
are 3-7% ahead of consensus. This is our top pick in the sector.
● Continuing revenue and EBIT growth differential relative to peers
can sustain stock price performance. TCS has generated 1-4%
additional QoQ revenue growth over the past year relative to
Infosys and has bridged the historic 400-500 bp gap in margins.
● We believe its execution abilities are not well understood by the
market. Due to its large fixed-price engagements historically, we
think TCS has built an extremely strong fixed-price execution
capability. As order sizes get larger for the industry, execution is
expected to become an important differentiating factor for winning
orders as well as for margins.
● TCS used to trade at a significant discount to Infosys for a long
period following its IPO. Given its superior operational
performance in the recent quarters, it now trades at a premium.
We think this premium can be sustained for some more time


Risks
A deterioration in the macro and the onset of a recession are the key
risk to TCS at this point of time.
Additionally, market expectations have built up post recent operational
performance. Even a small disappointment can cause short-term
volatility in the stock.

Mahindra & Mahindra: UBS Investment Research

UBS Investment Research
Mahindra & Mahindra
O n a strong growth trajectory
􀂄 Event: Raising PT on strong vol. growth, improving margin outlook
We raise our volume growth forecast for FY12/13 driven by strong ytd. Growth
across all segments – Tractors, LCVs and UVs. We raise standalone volume
growth YoY for M&M to 23%/17% from 14%/12% for FY12/13, respectively. We
continue to remain positive on rural demand momentum. We are 9%/11% ahead of
consensus at standalone PAT level for FY12/13, respectively.
􀂄 Impact: Raising FY12/13 EPS by 9%/15%, incorporating Ssangyong
M&M has continued to take price increases across segments, we expect this to
drive margin improvement for the co. in the coming quarters given flat to declining
commodity prices. We raise our standalone EBITDA margin forecast from
13%/12.9% to 14.4% for FY12/13, respectively. We incorporate Ssangyong into
our forecasts; however, we expect Ssangyong profitability to remain under
pressure over the next couple of years.
􀂄 Action: Maintain Buy, Preferred play on rural demand
We believe M&M given its high exposure to rural segment will continue to benefit
from strong govt. focus on improving rural income level and rural infrastructure.
The stock remains one of our preferred plays in the Indian auto sector.
􀂄 Valuation: Trading at 11x FY13 PE, raise PT to Rs.970 (from Rs.840)
We derive our 12 mth-price target from a sum-of-the-parts methodology. We value
the standalone business at Rs 740/share, based on 8x FY13E, and its subsidiaries
(including Ssangyong) at Rs 213/share rounded off to Rs 970 per share.

India Telecom - Tariff hikes: What is in consensus and what is not?: Credit Suisse

● It has been a little over two months since headline tariffs started
going up in the India telecoms sector. We study the changes to
consensus estimates on Bharti/Idea during this period to check
the extent to which consensus has factored in these tariff hikes.
We believe consensus has fully factored in the impact of recent
headline tariff increases onto RPM. However, there is still scope
for small upside from increases in call rates on STVs, in our view.
● On the other hand, consensus margin estimates have hardly
moved (as against theoretical 300-400 bp implied by the RPM
increase + other recent cost savings). We thus believe that
significant margin/earnings upside exists, and should come
through as margins start going up in the coming quarters.
● Increases in tax rate assumptions have been a dampener on
Bharti’s EPS estimates. Assuming tax increases are behind us,
we should start seeing EPS upgrades for Bharti.
● We believe the upgrade cycle in Indian telecoms is far from over;
we remain positive on the sector. Idea is our top pick. While we
rate Bharti OUTPERFORM, we believe the near-term earnings
pressure from non-cash forex losses could keep the stock volatile.

What are theoretical RPM and margin impacts?
For the headline tariff increases that happened recently starting mid-
July (on-net call rates up 20%, off-net call rates unchanged), the
implied RPM increase for a subscriber on the base plan is about 8%
(assuming no loss of usage). The overall impact on reported numbers
could be lower since not all subscribers would be on the base persecond
plan (e.g. many subs might be using special tariff vouchers
[STVs]). Based on our discussions with the industry, we believe that
large incumbents should be carrying 60-70% of calls on base tariffs
(the number would be lower for weaker operators who compete
primarily on STVs). Using this information, the net increase in RPM for
incumbent operators should be about 5.5%, from headline tariff
increases alone. (Note that call rates on even STVs went up recently,
thus the real RPM increase could be higher than 5.5%—for more
details see our notes on 30 June 2011 and 8 September 2011).
Assuming no change in usage and given current margin levels, every
1% RPM increase should lead to 65 bp and 75bp margin increases for
Bharti (mobile) and Idea, respectively. Further, we note that cost
control by the industry over the last few months (reduction in channel
margins, reduced gross adds, etc.,) should lead to much higher
margin upside than implied by only tariff increase. On the other hand,
this could get offset to some extent by (1) operators choosing to invest
some of the savings into the business, and (2) the fall in usage. At the
earnings level, every 1% RPM increase (all else constant) should lead
to EPS uplift of 3.5% and 12% for Bharti and Idea, respectively.
Figure 1 shows consensus revenue, EBITDA and EPS estimates for
Bharti and Idea pre-tariff hike and now (see below on how we distil
consensus estimates on Bharti’s SA mobile business from
consolidated estimates).
Headline RPM impact of tariff increases seem to be
factored in
We notice that consensus revenue estimates have gone up 4.7% and
5.8% for Bharti (mobile) and Idea, respectively, from early July levels.
If we assume that all changes to consensus happened only due to the
tariff increase—we can conclude that consensus has fully factored in
the base tariff increase. We note that there is still scope for small
upside from the impact of increases in call rates on STVs.
However, margins have hardly changed
At 30 bp and 127 bp for Bharti and Idea, respectively, EBITDA margin
increases corresponding to the above RPM/revenue increases are low,
compared with the 300-400 bp increases that the sensitivity
mentioned earlier implies. We thus believe that the big margin benefit
of tariff increase is yet to show in consensus—this should start flowing
through as we expect margins to go up in the coming quarters.
Why are Bharti’s EPS estimates not going up?
While Idea’s EPS estimates have gone up sharply (16%+) in the
recent upgrade cycle, Bharti’s EPS has actually come down by 1%.
This is despite revenue and EBITDA estimates going up—as we have
seen earlier. The reason behind this trend is the increase in tax rate
that the street had to build in post 1Q12 results and the tax guidance
(CS tax estimates have gone up post results). Assuming tax shocks
are behind us, we expect to see consensus EPS upgrades.
Note: Extracting Bharti’s mobile consensus estimates
We break down old consensus revenue/EBITDA numbers between
South Asia mobile and other businesses, using FY3/11 revenue
mix/mobile EBITDA margins for the company. Next, we assume that
other business estimates have not changed and that all increases in
consolidated estimates were driven by changes to the mobile
business. Since our focussing is on changes to estimates, the errors
in mix/margin assumptions do not have a significant bearing on our
findings.
One obvious limitation of the analysis in this report is that we assume
all consensus changes over the last two months have happened only
due to the RPM increase.

Buy Sintex: Macro headwinds: CLSA

Macro headwinds
We spoke to Sintex’s management earlier this week to get an update on
the custom moulding business, which is the key part of the company
exposed to the global macro economic environment. Whilst visibility on
FY12 is reasonably high and the company is confident of its guidance,
there are some downside risks in FY13 given the late cycle nature of the
business. The insulated nature of the building products business (48% of
Ebitda) limits aggregate risk. We cut estimates by 2-5% to build in more
cautious assumptions for the custom moulding business. Retain BUY.
Custom moulding business exposed to macro headwinds
Sintex’s custom moulding business is exposed to global and domestic macro
headwinds. The Bright Brother’s business derives over 90% of its revenues
from the Indian auto industry while Nief, despite geographic diversification,
remains a Europe centric business. Wasaukee is focused on the wind power
segment. The domestic business focuses largely on electricals. Together,
these businesses contributed ~42% of FY11 sales and ~35% of Ebitda.
Late cycle nature suggests FY13 risks
Sintex is primarily a tier II supplier within the auto components space (Bright
Brothers, 35% of Nief). This creates a lead time between the OEM market
slowing and the effect filtering through into Sintex’s sales. This was visible in
the previous downturn, when Sintex’s moulding businesses troughed in FY10.
This suggests that macro risks for Sintex may emerge in FY13. The other
segments within custom mouldings are also OEM driven.
Aggregate risk muted due to building products
Growth in Sintex is being driven primarily by the building products business
(monolithic, prefab), which are driven by government spend on social
infrastructure. Between FY08-11, building products’ contribution to Ebitda has
risen from 38% to 49%, and we expect a further increase to 58% by FY13.
These segments are much less vulnerable to the macro environment and are
also not susceptible to environmental clearance or other delays due to the
small size of projects. As a result, even with some fairly cautious assumptions
on the custom mouldings business, the aggregate earnings impact is limited.
Undemanding valuation, retain BUY
We have trimmed forecasts for the custom mouldings business growth and
margins, driving a 2-5% earnings cut. We have also reduced our price target
to Rs190 (Rs200 earlier), 26% upside. Despite the cautious assumptions, we
expect Sintex to deliver a 19% earnings CAGR over FY11-13. This is at odds
with the undemanding valuation of 7.4x FY12 PE. Retain BUY.

Zee Entertainment -- Off the pedestal, reducing TP :: Macquarie Research,

Zee Entertainment
Off the pedestal, reducing TP
Event
􀂃 We spoke with media ad sales consultants following a slip in channel rankings
for Zee TV to assess the damage on the top-line. We cut back our ad growth
est. for FY12 and FY13 and reduce our TP to Rs110. We remain cautious on
the stock and incorporate three key changes in our model: (1) Cut back in ad
forecast, (2) Giving the company the benefit of higher margins in a slowing
economic environment, and (3) A Rs7bn buyback through Mar-12. We believe
investors looking for an attractive entry point should wait for a 10% correction.
Impact
􀂃 Viewership fragmentation to eat into ad revenue pie. Zee TV has now
remained at the #4 slot for five consecutive weeks. Our checks with ad sales
consultants suggest that the strength of Sony’s popular game show KBC
through the festive season could upset the revenue share between GECs in
FY13. Our FY13 ad growth now stands at 8% (vs. 10% earlier). Our FY12 est.
moves down to 6% from 8% earlier.
􀂃 GDP slowdown makes for a pessimistic backdrop. Our India economist
believes that FY13 GDP growth has headwinds. The TV ad growth market
remains tightly linked to GDP performance. As the overall market remains
sluggish, loss of viewership for key channels could accentuate the pain for Zee.
􀂃 Regional channels – facing the competition heat. Key regional genres
Marathi and Bengali have seen Zee channels slip in recent months (See
Figure 3 and 4). We estimate that regional channels contribute ~25% of Zee’s
consolidated ad revenues. This segment has held up well during the 2008
slowdown and altered competitive dynamics this time around could see the
pressure on Zee.
􀂃 Buyback to provide downside support. The latest regulatory filing shows
that the company has bought back 11.8m shares through 22 Sept. The
company has put aside Rs7bn for buybacks at a maximum price of Rs126.
Earnings and target price revision
􀂃 We lower our advertising outlook leading to PAT reduction of 6% in
FY12/FY13. We revise our TP to Rs110 (vs Rs130 earlier).
Price catalyst
􀂃 12-month price target: Rs110.00 based on a DCF methodology.
􀂃 Catalyst: Pick-up in channel rankings for flagship channel Zee TV
Action and recommendation
􀂃 Remain cautious, prefer Dish TV. Cut back in ad growth assumption could
necessitate a reset in street margin expectations (at 28% vs. Macq: 27%). We
recommend investors wait for EPS expectations to possibly reset. Zee stock
has corrected 22% since 15 June (vs. BSE Sensex down 7%); see our note
Time for commercial break. Even so, a 10% correction could cause us to
become more constructive

Reliance Communications in advanced talks to sell tower unit stake

Mumbai: Reliance Communications, India’s second-largest mobile phone carrier by subscribers, is in advanced talks with a number of consortiums to sell its stake in its telecoms tower unit, Chairman Anil Ambani said on Tuesday.
The deal, once completed, will be the largest private equity transaction in India, Ambani, the eighth richest Indian according to the Forbes global rich list, said at the company’s annual shareholders meeting on Tuesday.
Saddled with more than $7 billion in net debt, Reliance Comm posted its eighth consecutive profit decline in the quarter ended June. The company has been trying to sell its tower unit to cut debt.
Ambani also said Reliance Comm’s founders will raise their stake in the company to 75 percent, from 67.9 percent at the end of June. Shares in the company extended their gains to 4.7 percent following the news.

Monday, September 26, 2011

Reliance Communciation - Target 140 UBS

Reliance Communication Limited
C hoosing to be more conservative
�� Event – RCOM stock has been a big under-performer ytd
RCom stock has under-performed Nifty by 26%, Bharti Airtel by 50% and Idea by
83% ytd. We believe that investor concerns are: 1) High financial leverage (Net
Debt/LTM EBITDA of 3.5) 2) Poor operational performance (While Idea and
Bharti have increased their quarterly mobile revenue by 108% and 49% in the last
12 quarters, RCom’s mobile revenues has increased by 5% during the same period)
�� Impact – Revise down our PT to Rs140
We reduce our price target for RCom to Rs140 (from Rs200) on account of 1)
lower earnings (from RCom ex Infratel) 2) lower valuations for Reliance Infratel.
We now value Infratel at Rs50 vs. Rs66 earlier as we lower our tower and tenancy
estimates given the current oversupply in the sector. 3) We increase WACC for
RCOM to 15% (from 13.2%) and Reliance Infratel to 14% (from 13%).
�� Action – Maintain Buy
At current levels, we believe RCom offers good risk reward for investors with a
higher risk appetite. The key risk to our positive thesis is poor execution. We think
RCom needs to de-lever as well as improve its operating performance to regain
investor confidence.
�� Valuation – Our PT of Rs140 is SoTP based
Our PT of Rs140 is SoTP based with Reliance Infratel valued at Rs50 per share.
We are lowering our consolidated earnings estimates for FY12E/13E by 52%/55%
as we factor in lower revenues from global enterprise business, higher interest
expense and lower contribution from Infratel.

Saturday, September 24, 2011

Saving vs inflation




In 2010-11, for the second time in three years, Indian households have seen a dip in net financial savings. The year 2008-09 was the previous time when the financial savings dipped. This led to a sharp fall in financial savings-to-GDP ratio to 9.7 per cent, the lowest since 1997-98. In 2009-10, financial savings, as a proportion of GDP, was 12.1 per cent.
Net financial savings is calculated as the difference between savings by the household (gross financial savings) and loans availed by them during a period.
While during the year 2008-09, the gross savings dipped (due to weak equity markets), this time around (2010-11), it is the rise in liabilities of the households that led to the fall in net financial savings. Financial liabilities of households have risen by 41 per cent year-on-year while financial savings rose marginally by 5.3 per cent.
The share of bank deposits in gross financial savings dipped this year. In fact, it has fallen steadily to 44 per cent in 2010-11 from 46 per cent a year ago, it peaked at 57 per cent in 2008-09. Interest rates in 2010-11 were rising, but still far below the levels of 2008-09. With small savings offering better rates than banks, their share improved to 6.5 per cent from 4.3 per cent the previous year.
Households held 13.3 per cent of the gross financial savings in cash, the highest level since 1995-96. The amount held by way of cash by households was to the tune of Rs 1.39 lakh crore.
Low rates also seemed to prompt higher borrowings by households, leading to a rise in financial liabilities. These loans could have been taken for consumption or for buying physical assets.

Deploying in physical assets?


Physical assets, basically investments in real estate and gold (if you consider it an asset), may have attracted fresh money. While data on physical assets isn't available, the home loans availed for the year ended March 2011 went up by a net Rs 45,181 crore from Rs 21,564 crore the previous year. The rising proportion of over Rs.20 lakh loans also suggests an investment angle to home buying.
Gold jewellery buying too has been quite the rage. According to the World Gold Council data, Indian households bought Rs 1.82 lakh crore of gold in the year 2010-11. If you consider this an investment, gold would have ranked only next to bank deposits and insurance in the savings preferences of Indian households.

Query Corner - Sep 24



Reliance Infrastructure (Rs 428.5): The long-term downtrend that began from January 2008 peak continues to be strong in Reliance Infrastructure. The recovery in 2009 halted at the long-term resistance around Rs 1,245 and the stock is once again close to its 2009 low. Immediate support for the stock is the band between Rs 350 and Rs 360 where the stock bottomed in June 2006 and again in October 2008.
Investors should hold the stock only as long as it trades above this zone. Breach of this support will drag the stock to Rs 280 or even Rs 206. Resistances for the medium-term will be at Rs 785 and Rs 1,000. Investors with lower penchant for risk can exit at this point and consider re-entry on a close above Rs 700. Long-term view will turn positive only on a strong close above Rs 1,246.
Glodyne Technoserve (Rs 363.9): Glodyne Technoserve received a sharp set-back in last December when it fell 46 per cent in one week. The stock is currently hovering around its key long-term support at Rs 318, moving in a narrow range between Rs 260 and Rs 320. A bounce from these levels will take the stock higher to Rs 450 or Rs 560 in the months ahead. Long-term view will turn positive only on close above Rs 560, paving the way for a shy at the previous life-time peak at Rs 776.
It would be best for investors to divest their holdings on close below Rs 260. Subsequent targets are Rs 183 and Rs 115.
I bought Pantaloon Retail at Rs 300. I would like to know the future of this stock from 1-2 year perspective.
J. Kavitha
Pantaloon Retail (Rs 227): This stock is in a medium-term decline since the October 2010 peak of Rs 527. Key medium-term support for the stock exists at Rs 270. Though the stock attempted to rebound from this level in July and August, it once again collapsed below this level last week.
Investors can hold the stock with stop at Rs 215. Decline below this level will pull the stock towards the March 2009 trough at Rs 105. The medium-term trend in the stock is weak. Inability on part of the stock to move above Rs 350 implies that the stock could slide lower in the months ahead.
Strong weekly close above this resistance is required to pave the way for ascent to Rs 380 or Rs 400. Long-term view will remain under a cloud as long as the stock trades below Rs 587 and we do not envisage a move above this level in the next 12 months.
I was allotted shares of L&T Finance during its initial public offer. Can I hold the same for long-term?
J. Rajagopalan
L&T Finance Holdings (Rs 48.6): As this stock was listed only in August this year, we do not have sufficient data points to carry out technical analysis. Since the stock is trading close to its offer price, long-term investors should not have second thoughts about holding the stock. Investors with a short-term investment perspective can buy the stock in declines with stop at Rs 47.6.
What are the short- and medium-term trends in IFCI, and Edelweiss Financial Services bought at Rs 65? Can I buy some more at current levels or exit?
Mrs V Lyda
IFCI (Rs 32.1): This trading favourite has not had it easy this calendar. The stock has been on a steady decline ever since it hit the high of Rs 80 last November. The stock has critical long-term resistance at Rs 80 and the long-term view can turn positive only if the stock manages a close above this level.
The medium-term view is extremely weak since IFCI has declined below the key medium-term support at Rs 40. The stock is attempting to stabilise in the zone between Rs 30 and Rs 35. Investors should divest their holdings on a close below Rs 30. We do not advise fresh purchases at current levels.
There is an open gap between Rs 27.4 and Rs 29 on the weekly chart that can provide some succour if the stock starts caving in. If this zone is breached, next halt will be the March 2009 low of Rs 15.8. Key resistances for the medium-term would be at Rs 51 and Rs 62. Short-term resistances are at Rs 40, Rs 43 and Rs 50. Investors should consider buying the stock only on a firm close above Rs 40.
Edelweiss Financial Services (Rs 27.7): This stock never recovered from the bludgeoning it received at the hands of investors in 2008. The recovery in 2009 and 2010 could not get the stock to retrace even one-third of the decline underscoring the fact that it continues in a vicious bear-market. The trend along both short- and medium-term time-frame is down in the stock, and it is heading towards its life-time low of Rs 21.8 recorded in March 2009.
Investors who are still holding the stock can do so only as long as the stock trades above Rs 22. A rebound from there can take the stock higher to Rs 40 or Rs 50 in the months ahead. Long-term view will turn positive only on close above Rs 68.
Please give me the long-term outlook on Jindal Southwest Holdings.
Vivek Agarwal
Jindal Southwest Holdings (Rs 604.9): The bear-market that began from the peak of Rs 3,322 in January 2008, continues to be in force in Jindal Southwest Holdings.
The third leg of this bear market is unfolding since last October. Since it has breached the key support at Rs 981, there is a probability of the stock sliding lower to Rs 577, Rs 361 or even Rs 193 in the months ahead.
Investors can exit the stock at this juncture and consider re-entry on a strong close above Rs 1,200. Subsequent resistances are at Rs 1,600 and Rs 2,200.
I purchased Bharati Shipyard at Rs 190 and Jyothy Labs at Rs 210. What are the medium- and long term prospects?
S. Sankaran
Bharati Shipyard (Rs 95.9): Bharati Shipyard too is in a long-term downtrend. The stock has shattered its key medium-term support at Rs 161 and is currently hanging around the psychological support at Rs 100. The recovery from the recent low at Rs 85 is, however, not too convincing and the stock could head lower to Rs 73 or Rs 44 in the days ahead.
Investors can divest their holding at these levels and consider re-entry on a close above Rs 165. Medium-term resistances would be at Rs 200 and Rs 250. The long-term trend will turn positive only on a close above Rs 350.
Jyothy Laboratories (Rs 164.8): Jyothy Laboratories is also in a medium-term downtrend but it is yet to breach the key long-term support at Rs 150. Investors can hold the stock as long as it trades above this level. A bounce from this level can take the stock higher to Rs 220 or Rs 260 where investors with medium-term perspective can exit. Move beyond Rs 260 will pave the way for rally to the previous life-time high at Rs 322.

Friday, September 23, 2011

AN INDIAN GLOBAL LEADER?

A topic far removed from the current Europe and US crisis; a reprieve. A stray thought which continues to haunt – why is it taking Ratan Tata so long to find a successor?  And why is it that India cannot create leaders like Steve Jobs?  This thought is someway interlinked to the current world economic crisis as in, the entire mess which we are in today is all due to poor governance. Be it the USA or Europe, some decisions have gone wrong and that has led to this spiraling crisis. And in India, we currently have a lack of leadership or governance in all facets – be it political or economical.
So where have all the leaders gone? Do we have a crisis of leadership at hand? We do not know for sure where the leaders have gone but what is certain is that we do have a crisis of leadership at hand. Not just at the political level but also in India Inc. It is well known all over the globe about how we Indians are fastidious about education. Right from the domestic help at home to the owner of a conglomerate, all know that education is empowerment and all try and ensure that the child gets education, at least. Thus when such is the push towards education, why is it that our system is not able to generate a Steve Jobs or Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg? Children while penning essays about ‘inspirational leaders’ might quote a Indira Nooyi or Vikram Pandit. Both of these were educated in India but could become global leaders because they were in USA. It is as simple as that. Even Kalpana Chawla became a household name because she was an astronaut in USA; had she been only in India, she might never have got off earth!
First about education. There are many free thinkers who feel that education in India, which is more about mugging up rather than conceptual clarity, kills all innovation. Infact many complain that as students, one is not allowed to be creative. Today, children are not allowed to solve a simple Math problem using their creativity; they have to necessarily follow the method given by the teacher. So when creativity is killed at such an early stage and at such simple levels, little wonder schools do not produce any innovators today! The famed movie, 3 Idiots talked about the same. And yes, there is immense talent in India. National Innovation Foundation has stated that there are over 100,000 outstanding innovations that have come from school dropouts and poor people from rural India. And NIF has managed to get some products commercially manufactured and some exported. But millions of ideas and innovators continue waiting for assistance in terms of funds, technical and design support.
A major shakeup in terms of quality of education is desperately needed in India. Our country has probably got the highest number of MBAs, yet, they cannot even think half as innovatively. So are we churning out just degrees with no substance?
And global leadership? Innovation is just not given its right due. You have an idea and toil years to get it going, spending all your life time savings – what is the guarantee that a patent will protect it from being copied immediately? And before getting to the patent part, are such ideas given any support at all? If Steve Jobs was an Indian and he had come up with a product like Apple in India, you think it could have become a global brand like the way it is today? No way!
Our desi companies are happy to export but money is not spent in developing a global identity. Why? Probably because we simply cannot afford it or probably because a ‘Made in India’ continues to attract condescending attention from the world consumers. Also, a pattern has been created wherein the emerging economies are becoming manufacturing hubs, while USA conserves its energy and resources in building sustainable, global brands. Thus emerging economies continue to remain ‘factories’ which is why we are probably driven more by the need to grow economically than concentrate on developing global brands.
It is true that a genius is born once in a lifetime and such a genius cannot be shackled by education. And at the same time, it is also equally true that education is a must. Or else Dhirubhai and Bill Gates would not have educated their own children. But India surely needs another Dhirubhai or Steve Jobs!
By Ruma Dubey

Thursday, September 22, 2011

UBS Investment Research L & T

UBS Investment Research
L & T
C ompany meeting takeaways
􀂄 Event: Execution in the power sector is on track
There have been concerns lately on progress of project execution in the power
generation sector. L&T highlighted that execution of power projects in its order
book are on track, except for the Karchana project of Jaiprakash. Though ordering
in the power generation segment is likely to be low, it expects good growth in the
T&D segment both in the Middle-East and India.
􀂄 Impact: Listing of the development business could be in a year’s time
Major funding requirements in this business would set-in in about a year’s time
and hence listing would be appropriate. This in our view would free-up the parent
entity to invest in other growth ventures (~US$350m likely investment in FY12,
similar amount invested in FY11; listing of Finance sub, another investment-heavy
business, has already been done this year). L&T continues to be conservative in
this business and would be selective in adding new projects. It would continue to
follow a strategy of exiting projects after eliminating execution risks.
􀂄 Action: Operating leverage could provide support to margins
Vertical integration has been the key driver for margin expansion over last several
years, though further upsides on this count are unlikely. Operating leverage could
aid margins. It believes commodity price volatility is the key risk and there has not
been a significant change in the competitive landscape. EBITDA margins in the
BTG business could be ~15% in a few years on the back of indigenization.
􀂄 Valuation: Reiterate Buy, Top pick in Indian infrastructure space
The stock is currently trading at lower than the average of its historical range.
Meeting with L&T- key takeaways
􀁑 Power segment: L&T stated that execution of power projects contained in
its order book, except the Karchana project of Jaiprakash, is on track (L&T
had stated in the Q1 conference call that there are land-acquisition related
issues in this project, and its execution is not a part of the guidance for
FY12). While power generation orders will be low this year, it expects good
growth in the T&D segment in the Middle East as well as India (it also stated
that orders in the Buildings and Factories have surprised on the upside so far).
Out of the Rs35bn order that it received from the PPN Power Generating
Company in Q1FY12 for gas-based power projects, it has booked only one
unit of Rs14bn so far. The balance two units could be booked in December-
PPN is likely to issue Notice to Proceed to the EPC contractors as it could
receive comfort on gas availability by then. Though no ordering is taking
place on gas-based power projects, prospect negotiations are on and orders
will be placed whenever clients get comfort on gas availability.
􀁑 Margins: L&T thinks that vertical integration has been the key driver of
margin expansion since 2005. Further upsides on this count are unlikely
though. Operating leverage could provide some support margins, though
commodity price volatility remains the key risk (about 35% of the contracts
are fixed-price). There has been no significant change in competitive
landscape that could impact margins. Long-term margins in the E&C
business are likely to be about 12% (we factor 12.1% EBITDA margins in
FY12; margins in FY11/FY10 were ~12.7%/12.8%; L&T has guided for 50-
75bps downside risk to margins in FY12). There is no material impact likely
on margins due to change in execution mix between different segments.
􀁑 BTG margins: As this is a manufacturing business, margins are likely to be
higher than EPC margins, and could be about 15% in a few years time.
Margin improvement will be driven by indigenization- will take about a year
for turbines and about a couple of years for boilers.
􀁑 Development business:
— Listing: Likely in about a year’s time, when major funding requirements
will come in. Though, both timing and form are not yet finalized- listing
for example could happen separately for different verticals- projects in
different verticals are at different stages of execution (road portfolio is
currently more mature and all 16 projects could be operational in about a
year’s time). L&T has 97.65% stake in this entity (it had purchased the
stake of PE investors last year).
— Additions to portfolio: Significant additions are unlikely going forward
and L&T will continue to be selective/conservative. Road projects could
be added if it gets good IRRs. T&D- it has bid, but not been successful so
far. Power- inclined towards Case 2 projects, with necessary linkages in
place and pass through mechanisms. Urban infra- is gradually exiting,
though Seawoods would be an addition (the company is positive on
transit-oriented developments). Railways- looking at opportunities in
monorail/metros across cities (Tamil Nadu might come up with a 111km
monorail project, though not known yet if it will be on a PPP basis).
Water/gas grids- could be big, but are nascent as of now.


— Thought process behind entering this business: 1) Significant business
opportunity in the infrastructure development space, 2) Forward
integration for the company (strategy of vertical integration has been
followed by the company across its various business segments), 3) Equity
upside from leveraging execution expertise and balance sheet strength (it
is better positioned in this regard in comparison to competition) and 4)
Adds a steady revenue stream on the relatively volatile/lumpy E&C
business.
— Exit strategy: Strategy is to benefit from equity upside after eliminating
execution risk. Typically would like to divest after two years- once base
traffic and traffic growth patterns are established. Unlikely to hold entire
stake for the full concession period of a project.
— Relationship with parent: Operates on arms-length basis. The
development business takes quote from independent consultants to
validate the pricing offered by the E&C arm for executing a project. It has
the flexibility to award projects to outside entities (has done that in the
past), though right of first refusal is with the E&C arm if it matches the
outside bid.
— Orders pending: Most of the orders from the development portfolio have
been placed on the E&C arm. Pending orders are- 1) ~US$1bn of
728MW hydro projects (to be placed in a few years, currently projects are
in DPR stage), 2) Balance order from Hyderabad Metro (major proportion
has already been placed- about US$1.6bn), 3) Dhamra Port expansion and
4) KPCL power project (likely in FY13).
􀁑 Hyderabad Metro:
— Risks: L&T has very good control over two out of three key risk
elements- execution (has been involved in Delhi, Chennai and Bangalore
metros and is executing the Mumbai monorail) and financing (strong
balance sheet). For understanding revenue risks, L&T did a due diligence
for a long time- for about a year. It expects about 18% equity IRRs from
this project.
— Revenues: It expects about 50% of revenues from ridership and about
50% from real estate rentals and advertisement. Three independent
consultants provided ridership estimates ranging from 12-22m; L&T used
~15m in its projections. Total real estate development is about 18msqft,
though it plans to develop about 6msqft in the first phase (it has a very
good understanding of the Hyderabad real estate market as it is present
there as a developer). It has assumed no revenues till the end of the fifthyear
from the agreement date, though the concession agreement allows it
to start operations on a line (the project has several lines) as and when it
is completed.
— Land acquisition: Over 90% of the land required for the project has been
acquired and it is not a major issue in this project. Execution has already
commenced though it will be in full swing only in about a year’s time.
􀁑 Power projects:

— Rajpura project: Expects equity IRRs of ~15%- the threshold level for
the company for annuity projects. Execution of 2x 700MW has
commenced. Execution on the remaining unit of 1x 700MW has not
started and is currently on hold, pending coal linkage.
— KPCL: This 2x 800MW project (in 50:50 JV with the Karnataka govt), is
likely to be booked as an order in FY13. This project was not included in
the order inflow guidance for this year.
􀁑 Ports:
— Dhamra: The port currently has a capacity of 27mt capacity and the
likely throughput in FY12 is 15mt. The company is finalizing more take
or pay contracts. Capacity can be increased upto 90mt. The port has a
draft of 18m and can take capsize vessels of 180,000DWT- it is in a sweet
spot given that other ports in the region have lower draft. This JV port is
under IDPL.
— Katupalli: This container port, 40km north of Chennai, has a capacity of
about 1.1m TEUs. It would be operationalized within a year’s time. It is
currently not a part of IDPL.
􀁑 Subsidiary investments: Likely to be Rs15-20bn this year, primarily in the
development business. Balance investments would be in shipbuilding and
forging subsidiaries.
Valuation
We have a Buy rating with a SOTP-based PT of Rs2,100.


􀁑 L & T
Larsen and Toubro (L&T) is India's largest engineering and construction (E&C)
company, and is the only dedicated engineering procurement and contracts
(EPC) company in India. It also has interests in electrical goods such as
switchgears and control panels. L&T has several subsidiaries engaged in various
businesses such as IT services, financing of industrial equipment, collection of
toll from roads constructed under the BOT scheme, and power generation. It has
also diversified into shipbuilding and power plant equipment businesses.
􀁑 Statement of Risk
We believe the main risks to our price target and estimates are: 1) a change in
order inflow estimates, 2) execution issues.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Some Fire stocks for new year 2012

This pdf contains some amazing stocks that may  give you explosive return over one year period.

Plz have a look at pdf.

 
Positives
􀂄
Strong revenue growth guidance of 25% for FY12
􀂄
Order inflow growth guidance of 15%
􀂄
Delhi airport in FY11 to limit margin fall
Potential write-back of provisions created for
􀂄
Downside risk to earnings limited
Key risks
􀂄
Macro economic uncertainties may cap orders
􀂄
Higher raw input costs could hurt margins
ITC
Positives
􀂄
business
Market leader in the demand-inelastic cigarettes
􀂄
cost inflation
High pricing power, hence less impacted by input
􀂄
FMCG business closing in towards breakeven
􀂄
packaging and hotels growing strong
Other businesses viz, agri, paperboard &
Key risks
􀂄
Trading at higher end of historical valuations
􀂄
A mid-year excise duty hike could hurt volumes
DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES
Positives
􀂄
pending with US FDA for approval
Strong pipeline in the US business; 76 ANDAs
􀂄
of strong traction in the OTC business
Robust growth in Russia continues on the back
􀂄
Ten product launches in FY12
􀂄
Strong growth in API business
Key risks
􀂄
Muted India sales in some products
􀂄
in Germany
Difficult pricing scenario hits revenue growth
HDFC BANK
Positives
􀂄
Consistent track record of strong earnings
􀂄
quality due to small exposure to stress sectors
High asset quality, including lowest risk on asset
􀂄
to support margins
Robust borrowing mix with high CASA of 49%
􀂄
floating provision it is at over 125 %)
High provision coverage ratio of 83% (including
Key risks
􀂄
interest rate scenario
Moderating loan growth and NIMs in a high
􀂄
Benign retail asset quality
BHARAT PETROLEUM
Positives
􀂄
exploration activities in Brazil over the next
two years
Likely to derive significant value from its
􀂄
Ramp, up in Bina refinery to boost GRMs
􀂄
well as fuel price deregulation
Key beneficiary of cooling crude oil prices as
􀂄
Trading at attractive valuations
Key risks
􀂄
overhang on the stock
Uncertainty regarding subsidy burden a major
BAJAJ AUTO
Positives
􀂄
Growth visibility supported by strong volumes
􀂄
attractive valuations
Better return ratios, good dividend payout and
􀂄
Better revenue mix will help sustain margins
􀂄
and ramp up capacity
Focus on leading brands, drive to grow exports
Key risks
􀂄
Increasing competition
􀂄
Rise in commodity prices could hurt margins
MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA
Positives
􀂄
enabling it to capture rising rural demand
M&M dominates the domestic tractors market
􀂄
Enjoys good pricing power in tractors & UVs
􀂄
lead incremental volume growth
The launch of its sub-tonne Maxximo and Gio to
􀂄
Long-term gains from Ssangyong Motors buy
Key risks
􀂄
M&M, as its entire portfolio is diesel-based
Higher duties on diesel vehicles would impact
􀂄
Higher interest rates may also impact demand
TATA STEEL
Positives
􀂄
Strong business model and attractive valuations
􀂄
volume growth and better margins
Cash flows are expected to grow, driven by
􀂄
6.8 million tonnes to 10 million tonnes moving fast
Projects in Jamshedpur to expand capacity from
􀂄
after its recent restructuring at Scunthrope
Tata Steel Europe (TSE) to come out stronger
􀂄
Room for TSE to improve productivity
Key risks
􀂄
Demand scenario in Europe
􀂄
Lower steel prices could impact earnings
SBI
Positives
􀂄
do well with better loan growth
With interest rates expected to ease, SBI should
􀂄
It has been able to protect its margins well
􀂄
provisioning coverage is near mandated levels
Even if there are concerns over asset quality,
􀂄
Market leader trading at attractive valuations
Key risks
􀂄
Higher interest rates
􀂄
Tightness in the G-sec yields
CMP DIV YIELD FY12 P/E FY12 P/BV
1,610 0.9 18.8 3.3
29%
CMP DIV YIELD FY12 P/E FY12 P/BV
1,494 0.8 16.6 4.2
22%
CMP DIV YIELD FY12 P/E FY12 P/BV
200 2.2 24.2 8.5
13%
CMP DIV YIELD FY12 P/E FY12 P/BV
472 0.7 21.6 3.7
30%
CMP DIV YIELD FY12 P/E FY12 P/BV
674 2.1 11.8 1.5
20%
COAL INDIA
Positives
􀂄
India
Key beneficiary of the structural coal deficit in
􀂄
tonnes (25% of total) by FY17 spurring margins
Washed coal volumes will surge to 150 million
􀂄
than import parity price of coal
Average realisation for CIL is still 50% lower
􀂄
Largest coal reserves in the world of 22 bln tonnes
Key risks
􀂄
Plan of 26% profit sharing for local development
􀂄
Inability to get environmental clearances or land
AXIS BANK
Positives
􀂄
brisk pace of 25% plus in FY11-13
The bank’s loan book is expected to grow at a
􀂄
Stable margins and healthy asset quality
􀂄
drive retail fee income
Growing franchise, new products will further
􀂄
of 40% with HDFC Bank will narrow
As it delivers consistent earnings, valuation discount
Key risks
􀂄
in higher slippages and slow down in business
Deterioration of macro environment can result
PANTALOON RETAIL
Positives
􀂄
more income to consumption, lifestyle products
Growing trend among consumers to allocate
􀂄
Allowing FDI in multi-brand retailing
􀂄
assets over next 12-18 months and reduce debt
The company plans to monetise its non-retail
􀂄
Valuation of investment in subsidiaries is worth
`
3,000-4,000 crore
Key risks
􀂄
Higher inventory days remain
􀂄
Slow revenue growth due to rollout delays
BHARTI AIRTEL
Positives
􀂄
by improvement in rates
Turning point for Indian telecom industry led
􀂄
in voice revenue per minute (RPM) and margins
Rate hikes should lead to gradual improvement
􀂄
3G services will also add 3-5% to RPM by FY13
􀂄
augur well and will boost earnings in coming years
Its African business and improving cash flows
Key risks
􀂄
Any move to reverse rate hike will hit profits
􀂄
Trai recommendations on spectrum
CMP DIV YIELD FY12 P/E FY12 P/BV
375 1.0 13.6 5.2
23%
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES
Positives
􀂄
led by huge operating cash flow and proceeds
from BP
Company will be net cash positive in FY12,
􀂄
E&P business not fullly reflecting in valuations
􀂄
years will boost its earnings significantly
Doubling of petchem capacity in the next 2-3
Key risks
􀂄
Higher cash allocation to unrelated areas
􀂄
refining businesses
Slowdown in global petrochemicals and
CMP DIV YIELD FY12 P/E FY12 P/BV
782 0.9 10.6 1.1
48%
REDINGTON INDIA
Positives
􀂄
at a fast pace
India, which is 61% of PBIT, continues to grow
􀂄
and iPad segments
High growth and potential in the smart phone
􀂄
capital cycle
Strategic initiative to improve the working
􀂄
and benefits from GST implementation
Value unlocking from business such as NBFC
Key risks
􀂄
Further interest rate hikes
􀂄
Currency fluctuation
CMP DIV YIELD FY12 P/E FY12 P/BV
96 1.2 13.3 2.1
34%
JINDAL STEEL & POWER
Positives
􀂄
power and steel assets
Current valuations only reflect the operational
􀂄
iron ore assets not fully reflected in valuations
Power expansion by 4,400 Mw, foreign coal and
􀂄
Cost of power & steel production among lowest
􀂄
by volume expansion
Earnings to grow at about 22% annually, backed
Key risks
􀂄
Final outcome of draft mining bill
􀂄
Decline in global commodity prices
CMP DIV YIELD FY12 P/E FY12 P/BV
520 0.2 10.3 2.6
35%
GLENMARK PHARMA
Positives
􀂄
market by 16 % during FY11-13
Niche product launch to drive growth in the US
􀂄
business to grow at 16% during FY11-13
With an increase in market share, domestic
􀂄
Valuations are lower compared to peers
􀂄
Upside from other products in the pipeline
Key risks
􀂄
million, though it will appeal in higher court
Lost Abbott and Sanofi cases, liable to pay $16
􀂄
Pricing pressure in the US market
CMP DIV YIELD FY12 P/E FY12 P/BV
325 0.1 13.2 3.3
20%
CIPLA
Positives
􀂄
Company is the best play on emerging markets
􀂄
products to drive growth in the medium term
Supply agreements with 22 US players for 118
􀂄
to Europe will be a key positive.
Commencement of exports of CFC-free inhalers
􀂄
earnings for FY12/13.
Potential MNC contracts are likely to improve
Key risks
􀂄
pricing
New pharma policy creates uncertainty over
􀂄
could result in a significant cash outflow
NPPA liability of ` 1,200 crore (if it materialises)
CMP DIV YIELD FY12 P/E FY12 P/BV
280 1.0 20.9 3.0
29%
JAIN IRRIGATION
Positives
􀂄
30% annually over the next five years
MIS business, which is 50% of sales, will grow
􀂄
higher farm income and government initiatives
Growth is backed by expansion in new states,
􀂄
Improvement in capital efficiency
􀂄
EV/Ebitda
Stock trading at 6-year median level at
Key risks
􀂄
Capital allocation to non-MIS business
􀂄
Slow turnaround in overseas markets
CMP DIV YIELD FY12 P/E FY12 P/BV
172 0.5 17.2 3.4
29%
GODREJ CONSUMER
Positives
􀂄
Firm growth in all its major categories
􀂄
to add to margins
Soft commodity prices and product price hike
􀂄
Earnings surprise could come from Darling acquisition
􀂄
two years
Earnings growth of 21 per cent over the next
Key risks
􀂄
Rising competition in key segments
􀂄
Sharp rise in prices of inputs
CMP DIV YIELD FY12 P/E FY12 P/BV
425 1.4 24 6.6
12%
CMP DIV YIELD FY12 P/E FY12 P/BV
1,075 1.3 10.4 2.0
63% CMP DIV YIELD FY12 P/E FY12 P/BV
294 0.3 24.7 1.8
23%
CMP DIV YIELD FY12 P/E FY12 P/BV
738 1.6 15.7 3.7
4%
CMP DIV YIELD FY12 P/E FY12 P/BV
1,571 2.5 15.6 7.2
12%
CMP DIV YIELD FY12 P/E FY12 P/BV
404 0.3 19.6 2.6
31%
CMP DIV YIELD FY12 P/E FY12 P/BV
469 2.6 6.8 1.4
58%
CMP DIV YIELD FY12 P/E FY12 P/BV
1,946 1.5 10.5 1.7
54%
Amid slowing growth and global uncertainties, here are the top recommendations of leading research houses
TAKE 20: STOCKS YOU CAN GAIN FROM
The stock recommendations
are of
Edelweiss Research,
ENAM Securities, Macquarie
Research
Securities
figures are estimates
and Motilal Oswal. All FY12 & FY13

LARSEN & TOUBRO